From: Sean C. (Upp_and_Upp@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2006 - 21:24:49 ART
Hi Tim,
For grins, change the ACLs to:
ip access-list extended route2blue
permit icmp any any
permit ip any any
and see if they get PBR'd. If 'any any' doesn't work, something strange
going on....
HTH,
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Gregory" <tgregory@lincoln.ac.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:51 PM
Subject: RE: SVI PBR
For some reason, the only traffic which gets policy routed is broadcast
traffic originating from the matched subnet... Everything else is routed
normally.. Very confused..
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tim Gregory
Sent: 29 August 2006 15:57
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SVI PBR
Hi Guys..
When you configure PBR on a SVI, does it behave normally?
Basically I've got a scenario where I need to take some traffic coming
from a particular subnet and force it down a gre tunnel, so I've
configured the interface like this..
interface Vlan24
ip address 10.1.24.129 255.255.255.128
ip helper-address 194.80.56.107
ip route-cache policy
ip policy route-map force-tunnel
route-map force-tunnel permit 10
match ip address route2blue
set ip next-hop 10.254.253.1
ip access-list extended route2blue
permit icmp 10.1.24.128 0.0.0.127 any
permit ip 10.1.24.128 0.0.0.127 any
But traffic still follows the normal ip routing table path, I can't for
the life of my figure out why its not being routed down the next hop of
10.254.253.1.... Im sure its something very basic :[
Thanks...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:59 ART