RE: Vlan loadbalancing on trunks

From: Duane Dewitt (Duane.Dewitt@za.verizonbusiness.com)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 07:20:24 ART

• Next message: Russell Kelly \(rukelly\): "RE: Re(2): Re(2): DISTANCE Command"
• Previous message: Plukkie: "Vlan loadbalancing on trunks"
• Maybe in reply to: Plukkie: "Vlan loadbalancing on trunks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I would say only for non default VLAN's.

Regards
Duane
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Plukkie
Sent: 28 August 2006 11:38 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Vlan loadbalancing on trunks

Hi,

Suppose I have added vlan 14, 15 and 17 to my initial default switch
setup and have two cross-over trunks.
If the task describes to loadbalance the UNEVEN vlans on the the
switches to trunk X. and the EVEN to trunk Y There should be no
redundancy.

My solution would be to allow ONLY EVEN to trunk Y and ONLY UNEVEN to
trunk X on both switches.

trunk X
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,15,17

trunk Y
switchport trunk allowed vlan 14

My question:
the default vlan on the switches is vlan 1. Should this one be taken
into account in the solution or should you only provide solutions for
the non-default vlans?

gr Plukkie

• Next message: Russell Kelly \(rukelly\): "RE: Re(2): Re(2): DISTANCE Command"
• Previous message: Plukkie: "Vlan loadbalancing on trunks"
• Maybe in reply to: Plukkie: "Vlan loadbalancing on trunks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:59 ART