From: sabrina pittarel (sabri_esame@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 03:30:20 ART
Angelo,
remember that what I said is true *only* for External EIGRP routes (D EX).
With internal routes (D) the commands works as expected whether you specifiy a single gateway/neighbor (wilcard mask 0.0.0.0) or you specify all (wm 255.255.255.255)
Sabrina
----- Original Message ----
From: Angelo De Guzman <a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com>
To: dan.bliss@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com; Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>
Cc: sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 10:36:00 PM
Subject: Re(2): Re(2): DISTANCE Command
Hi,
I still cannot make it work with the 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 argument for the
distance command.
@ R5
router eigrp 1
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Ethernet0/0
network 172.30.200.0 0.0.0.127
distance 99 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 1
no auto-summary
!
access-list 1 permit 10.7.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 10.7.2.0 0.0.0.255
!
R5#sh ip route | include D EX
D EX 10.7.1.0/24 [170/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:04:02, Ethernet0/0
D EX 10.7.2.0/24 [170/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:04:02, Ethernet0/0
@ R7
router eigrp 1
redistribute static route-map eigrpstatic
passive-interface default
no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
network 172.30.200.0 0.0.0.127
network 192.168.7.7 0.0.0.0
!
access-list 1 permit 10.7.0.0 0.0.3.255
!
route-map eigrpstatic permit 10
match ip address 1
!
ip route 10.7.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
ip route 10.7.2.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
!
Still no luck in making this work. So far what Sabrina mentioned is still true.
(as for my case)
but if I use network statement under EIGRP of R7 it works perfectly fine!
@ R7
R7#sh run | begin router eigrp 1
router eigrp 1
passive-interface default
no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
network 10.7.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.7.2.0 0.0.0.255
network 172.30.200.0 0.0.0.127
network 192.168.7.7 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
!
@ R5
R5#sh ip route eigrp
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
D 10.7.1.0/24 [99/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:53, Ethernet0/0
D 10.7.2.0/24 [99/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:50, Ethernet0/0
192.168.7.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 192.168.7.7 [90/409600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:05:36, Ethernet0/0
Even with the config below. I can make it work.
R5#sh run | begin router eigrp
router eigrp 1
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Ethernet0/0
network 172.30.200.0 0.0.0.127
distance 99 172.30.200.7 0.0.0.0 1
no auto-summary
!
R5#sh ip route eigrp
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
D 10.7.1.0/24 [99/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:57, Ethernet0/0
D 10.7.2.0/24 [99/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:57, Ethernet0/0
192.168.7.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 192.168.7.7 [90/409600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:57, Ethernet0/0
Regards,
Angelo
Victor Cappuccio (8/28/06 12:49 PM):
>
>Dan, Thank you very much
>
>It works very great.- now makes mure sense, the 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 does
>not check for the source of the update Cool!!!
>
>This list is so great
>
>Victor.-
>
>
>
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
>dan.bliss@gmail.com
>Enviado el: Domingo, 27 de Agosto de 2006 11:27 p.m.
>Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Asunto: Re: Re(2): DISTANCE Command
>
>Try changing your distance statement to:
>
>distance 99 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 1
>
>and your acl to include a list of prefixes you are trying to affect
>
>for example
>access-list 1 permit 10.7.0.0
>access-list 1 permit 10.7.1.0
>access-list 1 permit 10.7.2.0
>access-list 1 permit 10.7.3.0
>
>This is the only successful way I have seen the command work. (besides just
>match all) I would also like to know what
>logic the router is using to match routes in the distance statement. Is this
>
>the only way to do it? The doc's are somewhat vague. If anyone can shed some
>
>light on the subject it would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dan Bliss
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Angelo De Guzman" <a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Plukkie" <plukkie@gmail.com>
>Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 9:00 PM
>Subject: Re(2): DISTANCE Command
>
>
>> Hi,
>> I changed my ACL and still does not work.
>>
>> Sabrina,
>> I think you are right. Thanks. Do you have a document for this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Angelo
>>
>> Plukkie (8/27/06 3:36 PM):
>>>
>>>Try to change your mask in acl 1 to 0.0.3.255.
>>>
>>>gr
>>>
>>>
>>>On 27 Aug 2006 13:45:00 +0800, Angelo De Guzman <
>>>a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Anyone had an issue with the distance command under EIGRP. I wanted to
>>>> set
>>>> an
>>>> AD of 99 to routes I am receiving from my neighbor 172.30.200.7. I can't
>>>> make
>>>> this work???
>>>>
>>>> IOS version: System image file is "flash:c3640-js-mz.124-5.bin"
>>>>
>>>> R5#sh ip eigrp neighbor
>>>> IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 1
>>>> H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT
>>>> RTO Q Seq
>>>> (sec) (ms) Cnt
>>>> Num
>>>> 0 172.30.200.6 Et0/0 14 00:00:02 4
>>>> 200 0 123
>>>> 1 172.30.200.7 Et0/0 14 02:49:42 8
>>>> 200 1 53
>>>>
>>>> !
>>>> access-list 1 permit 10.7.0.0 0.0.3.0
>>>> !
>>>> router eigrp 1
>>>> redistribute connected route-map connect2eigrp
>>>> redistribute ospf 1 match internal external 1 external 2
>>>> passive-interface default
>>>> no passive-interface Ethernet0/0
>>>> network 172.30.200.0 0.0.0.127
>>>> default-metric 1000 1000 255 100 1500
>>>> distance 99 172.30.200.7 0.0.0.0 1
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>>
>>>> For some reason the AD does not change.
>>>> D EX 10.7.1.0/24 [170/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:51,
>>>> Ethernet0/0
>>>> D EX 10.7.2.0/24 [170/2841600] via 172.30.200.7, 00:01:51,
>>>> Ethernet0/0
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Angelo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ***********************
>>>> No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>>>>
>>>> Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>>>> ***********-***********
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>***********************
>>>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>>>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>>>
>>>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>>>***********-***********
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ***********************
>> No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>>
>> Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>> ***********-***********
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>
***********************
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
***********-***********
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:59 ART