From: sabrina pittarel (sabri_esame@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2006 - 22:21:51 ART
Hi Daniel,
if the question doesn't specify an address to use and
there's no tracking requirement I would go for option
one.
But this only my opinion
Sabrina
--- Daniel Fischer <Daniel.Fischer@gmx.net> wrote:
> hi group
> which vrrp implementaion is most "ccie style"?
>
> 1. use interface ip of master router as vrrp address
> -> tracking not possible
>
> R1--FR
> | \
> Client-ETH| R3--->
> | /
> R2--FR
>
> R1: interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 125.1.125.1 255.255.255.0
> vrrp 1 ip 151.1.125.1
>
> R2: interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 125.1.125.2 255.255.255.0
> vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.1
>
> 2. use extra address (equivalent to hsrp) and track
> (if redundant uplinks)?
>
> R1: track 1 interface serial 0/0/0 line-protocol
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 125.1.125.1 255.255.255.0
> vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.3
> vrrp 1 track 1 decrement 20
> vrrp 1 priority 110
>
>
> R2: track 1 interface serial 0/0/0 line-protocol
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 125.1.125.2 255.255.255.0
> vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.3
> vrrp 1 track 1 decrement 20
> vrrp 1 priority 100
>
>
> Daniel
>
>
> --
>
>
> Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer
> Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> Ideal f|r Modem und ISDN:
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART