From: Radoslav Vasilev (deckland@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 19 2006 - 10:57:16 ART
On 8/19/06, Michael Stout <michaelgstout@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I know of two ways to do wred.
> The first, and i believe most preferable is to use MQC.
> using wred with class based qos will require cef.
> However, i am unable to find that requirement in the docs, currently.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk824/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094978.shtml
The second is to use wred on the interface.
> I don't think the interface method requires cef.
>
> After some deliberation i think wred is a worthwihile queueing strategy
> for circuits that experience a high number of output drops.
>
> If anybody knows more about this subject or has used it effectivly in
> production environments, I would be greatful to hear your valuable input.
>
> Thank You.
> Mike
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com>
> To: CCIElab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: CEF and QOS
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if we have to worry about turning off CEF to get QOS
> parameters to work properly. For example, if we would like to
> configure explicit congestion notification for WRED, do we have to
> turn off CEF.
>
> Configuration:
> Policy-map WREDandECN
> class class-default
> bandwidth percent 22
> random-detect
> random-detect ecn
>
> s0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> service-policy out WREDandECN
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART