From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 11:25:17 ART
One side of your link is Physical (Non-Broadcast) and wants a DR, and
believe it is the DR. The other side is point to point and doesn't believe
there needs to be a DR.
Basically both sides have become irritated with each other for not thinking
the other side is following the rules about who has priority to send
updates! Even though the use of a DR is not part of the peering
"requirements" it really is very important!
Try changing your network type on one side or the other to agree in that
requirement and I think you'll find things much simpler!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bizzell, Keith
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:19 AM
To: Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Can't form OSPF virtual link
On one router, I have area 0 and 10 with a p2p sub configured. On the
other, I have area 10 configured and a physical interface. Virtual link is
set up under the ospf process on both routers for area 10. Both routers see
each other in the ospf neighbor table in full state, but not under an
OSPF_VL. There are no routes exchanged. What should I look to next?
Thanks,
Keith
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART