From: Curt Gregg \(cugregg\) (cugregg@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Aug 12 2006 - 17:21:56 ART
Tony,
I will be hitting this tomorrow.
I'll update you on what I see.
Curt
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
tonynguyenchi
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 4:11 AM
To: Sami; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IE lab 9 Task 4.10 redistribution
Dear Group,
I did as the solution but in the R3 routing table, the route to
150.1.4.0 sometimes is learned by RIP (it's loop), sometimes learned by
EIGRP. I shutdowned the frame-relay connection of R4 already.
Anybody has encounted it before?
Thanks and best regards,
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sami" <sy1977@gmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: IE lab 9 Task 4.10 redistribution
> Group,
>
> Any one who is doing IE lab 9 task 4.10 ,
>
>
> R4 has a frame relay connection s0/0/0 to R1 which is active and there
is
> one backup link s0/1/0 to R5 which is in standby . On active link
RIP is
> running and backup eigrp is runing , loopback is advertise in rip.
>
> Task say ensure that everyone has connectivuty to R4 backup link and
> loopback 0 when FR connecttion is down and R4 see only one default
route
> pointing towrds R5. you are allowed one static route to accomplis
this.
>
> What I did is create a static route and point towards s0/1/0
> ip router 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0/1/0
>
> and redistributed loopback in eigrp using route-map. when frame relay
link
> goes down 0.0.0.0/0 become active because interface become active and
> eigrp
> starts running and advertise loopback 0 to R5 and rest of the network.
>
> IE souldtion guide says something else, they use a summary address on
R5
>
> int s0/1/0
> ip summary address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
>
> ip route 150.1.4.0 255.255.255.0 148.1.45.4 5
> redistibute connected metric 64 10 255 1 1500
>
> Why are they doing this on R5 when very simple solution with only two
> command can be implemeted on R4.
>
> Could some please explain.. if my solution is wrong ..
>
> Thanks
> Sami
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART