From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sat Aug 12 2006 - 01:24:56 ART
I also am a bit confused on the process of the pruning function. I have
been labbing this up different ways and I can get the trunk allowed
command to work as it should. However, the pruning function on the
interface that is trunking doesn't appear to be pruned back on the
client. I still see all the vlans advertised (even though they are not
being used). I thought that the pruning would cause the vlans to not
show up in the "show vlan" list of the client. Is this not the case?
Here is my config under the port that is trunking. VTP is set for the
server and pruning is enabled..... Thoughts?
interface FastEthernet0/13
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2-999
switchport trunk pruning vlan 2-10
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
kwasi-ccie@comcast.net
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:43 PM
To: Godswill Oletu; Tim Chan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: trunk allowed vs pruning
You only need to remove vlan 8 from the prune eligible list on sw1 port
fa0/13 to solve problem 1 (switchport trunk pruning vlan remove 8).
Problem 2 is already solved by the vtp pruning that you enbaled on both
switches. You do not need to play with the vtp allowed list to solve
these 2 problems. Test it out.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Godswill Oletu <oletu@inbox.lv>
> Tim,
>
> The solution you provided will only take care of the first task, once
VLAN 8
> is removed from the prunning eligible list of interface fa0/13, the
switch
> will continue to receive traffic for VLAN 8 regardless of local
assignment
> or not.
>
> For the second task, you have to remove VLAN 8 from the VLAN allowed
list on
> interfaces fa0/14 & fa0/15.
>
> HTH
>
> Godswill Oletu
> CCIE #16464
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Chan"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:21 AM
> Subject: trunk allowed vs pruning
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I keep confusing myself and need some clarification.
> >
> > What's the relationship between "vtp pruning" and "switchport trunk
> allowed"?
> >
> > In one of the workbook labs, one of the tasks states:
> > 1. although it does not have it locally assigned ensure that SW1
receives
> traffic for vlan 8 over Fast0/13
> > 2. traffic for vlan 8 should not be received over any of the other
trunk
> links.
> >
> > (The two switches are trunked together on Fast0/13-15 using dot1q.)
> >
> > So my thinking is to do "switchport trunk allowed vlan 8" on
fast0/13 and
> to not allow it on 14 & 15.
> >
> > But the solution says the answer is "switchport trunk pruning vlan
> 2-7,9-1001".
> >
> > How does this solution solve either of the two tasks?
> >
> > Please advise,
> > -tim
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART