Re: trunk allowed vs pruning

From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2006 - 08:43:31 ART


Tim,

The solution you provided will only take care of the first task, once VLAN 8
is removed from the prunning eligible list of interface fa0/13, the switch
will continue to receive traffic for VLAN 8 regardless of local assignment
or not.

For the second task, you have to remove VLAN 8 from the VLAN allowed list on
interfaces fa0/14 & fa0/15.

HTH

Godswill Oletu
CCIE #16464

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Chan" <timanji@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:21 AM
Subject: trunk allowed vs pruning

> Hi all,
>
> I keep confusing myself and need some clarification.
>
> What's the relationship between "vtp pruning" and "switchport trunk
allowed"?
>
> In one of the workbook labs, one of the tasks states:
> 1. although it does not have it locally assigned ensure that SW1 receives
traffic for vlan 8 over Fast0/13
> 2. traffic for vlan 8 should not be received over any of the other trunk
links.
>
> (The two switches are trunked together on Fast0/13-15 using dot1q.)
>
> So my thinking is to do "switchport trunk allowed vlan 8" on fast0/13 and
to not allow it on 14 & 15.
>
> But the solution says the answer is "switchport trunk pruning vlan
2-7,9-1001".
>
> How does this solution solve either of the two tasks?
>
> Please advise,
> -tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:56 ART