From: Stefan Grey (examplebrain@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2006 - 12:27:01 ART
yes thnaks. This works fine. All advises where great!
>From: "Prathap C" <csprathap@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Prathap C" <csprathap@gmail.com>
>To: "Stefan Grey" <examplebrain@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Prefix-list RIP and redistribution
>Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:00:58 +0530
>
>try to do with ge & le in prefix-list and then redistribute to rip.
>
>
>
>On 8/1/06, Stefan Grey <examplebrain@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Hello guys!
>>
>>
>>lo - R1 - R2 -lo
>>
>>I have rip configured between R1 and R2. I also configured some loopbacks
>>interfaces on R1
>>with IP addresses of: 111.1.x.0 (x=1,2,3,4,5,6,7). I want redistribute
>>this
>>directly connected interfaces into RIP so that R2 has the route to it.
>>
>>I configure: router rip
>>redistribute connected metric 2 route-map NEWCONNECTED:
>>
>>Question:
>>If I use configuration A everything works just fine:
>>A:
>>access-list 2 permit 111.1.0.0 0.0.7.255
>>route-map NEWCONNECTED permit 10
>>match ip address 2
>>
>>But if I use configuration B nothig is redistributed, and R2 doesn't see
>>any
>>routes from R1:
>>b:
>>ip prefix-list NEW permit 111.1.0.0/21
>>route-map NEWCONNECTED permit 10
>>match ip address prefix-list NEW.
>>
>>Why ip prefix-list doesn't match this routes. I just can't understand what
>>is ther reason of such behaviour. Could anybody please explain.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Find accommodation FAST with MSN Search! http://search.msn.ie/
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:56 ART