From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2006 - 14:39:53 ART
Sami ??
Do you mind to rephrase the question? Or point me where this question came
from..
AFAIK Voice Traffic should be Marked as Critical (5). QoS Experts you mind
to chime in here please
R2(config-ext-nacl)#do show ip access-list
Extended IP access list 123
20 permit udp any any precedence critical
R2(config-pmap-c)#do show run class-map
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 88 bytes
!
class-map match-all VOICE
match ip rtp 16384 16383
!! match access-group 123 !! I do not think this is necessary BUT :S
!
end
R2(config-ext-nacl)#do show run policy-map
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 66 bytes
!
policy-map QVoice
class VOICE
bandwidth percent 20
And do not forget to apply it under the interface service-policy input
QVoice
Yeah QOS is a kick in the back
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Sami
Enviado el: Jueves, 03 de Agosto de 2006 11:20 a.m.
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Voice traffic
Group,
Task say critical voice traffic should have 20% bandwidth. I am confused
with critical word. Do I match udp taffic with precedence critical or do I
match udp port range 16384 32767 and don't care about critical word.
Which one is CCIE lab way ?
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:55 ART