Fwd: EIGRP: two eigrp processes on one interface ? what will be

From: Hash Aminu (hashng@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2006 - 05:47:22 ART

Next message: Bajo: "Re: default routes in EIGRP"
Previous message: Cacca Mucca: "Articulating the need for a router"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hash Aminu <hashng@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 31, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: EIGRP: two eigrp processes on one interface ? what will be the
implications
To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>

hello group study

i have been thinking of this wired sceanrio of having a set up like this

r10(so)------(s0)r1(s1)--eigrp(AS 10)------(s1)r2(s0)-----eigrp(as
100)-----rest of the network

if you enable the s1 interface f r2 to be in both eigrp processes i.e 10 and
100 what would be the implication if the rest of the network is in another
routing protocol ?

TIA

hash

-- B.Eng, MCP,CCNA, CCNP

Next message: Bajo: "Re: default routes in EIGRP"
Previous message: Cacca Mucca: "Articulating the need for a router"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:55 ART