From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sat Jul 29 2006 - 19:10:05 ART
Ohhh sorry I forgot to say that R2 and R3 are non Cisco, so CDP is not
available also, in case off thinking of Route-maps with ip next-hop values.
_____
De: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
Enviado el: Sabado, 29 de Julio de 2006 06:02 p.m.
Para: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Asunto: Need a hint for a real world taks.
Guys,
What if we have 3 routers connected like in this:
R1 ==A= Sw1 ==T== Sw2 =A==R2-L0
=A==R3-L0
A = Access
T = Trunk
If the ASCII diagram came mess up, R1 connects via Vlan X to Sw1 f0/1, sw1
uses f0/13 to trunk with sw2 f0/13, sw2 connects with R2 using f0/2 and with
R3 using f0/3 in Vlan X
Please note that Im not allowed to use Dynamic Routing for this scenario
(real World Taks).
So, I need to find a way other than using tunnels interfaces to get rid of
the static route create at R1, if R2 or R3 Ethernet goes down. Is there
anyway you can think to solve this task? The use on tunneling here is not
scalable (I think), because you will need more ip addressing from the
tunnels and more ip routes
Any hint for this task please?
Thanks
Victor.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART