From: Duncan Maccubbin (duncan.maccubbin@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2006 - 08:34:14 ART
There are a fair amount of things missing but nothing huge. If they put MPLS in the lab soon that would be a probelm. Stuff like:
Adaptive Frame Relay Traffic Shaping for Interface Congestion
Bidirectional PIM
Frame Relay Voice Adaptive Traffic Shaping
MPLS
NAT - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)
NAT - Ability to use Routes Maps with Static Translations
(A lot of NAT)
TCL scripting
Those are just some highlights based on 12.4(5b). It is a matter of $ in the end. It looks like 1841s can be had for the $600-$700 range while 2811s are in the $1200 to $1300 range. On the good side though, you should be able to resell them in a year for the same price.
-----Original Message-----
>From: WorkerBee <ciscobee@gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 28, 2006 6:03 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Cisco 3560 Switch
>
>Hi Group,
>
>Anyone use Cisco 1841 instead of 2811? Any missing features for 1841
>running advanced features?
>
>Thanks
>
>On 7/28/06, Marc Russell <mrussell@ccbootcamp.com> wrote:
>> You can run 12.4 Advanced Services on a 3640.
>>
>>
>> Marc Russell
>> Network Learning, Inc.
>> (A Cisco Learning Partner)
>> YES! We take Cisco Learning credits!
>> Ph# 248-620-9603
>> www.ccbootcamp.com/hardware.html (CCIE practice hardware)
>> www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> WorkerBee
>> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:50 AM
>> To: Elliott Reyes
>> Cc: bellis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: Cisco 3560 Switch [bcc][faked-from]
>> Importance: Low
>>
>> Now I am in a dilemma, should I get 2811 instead of 3640 routers?
>> Since Nov 13 onwards,
>> Enterprise Basic/Plus will be replaced to Advanced Services??
>>
>> On 7/13/06, Elliott Reyes <elliottreyes@adelphia.net> wrote:
>> > How much different are the two switches anyway's if we have 3550's do
>> > we have to all go out and now buy 3560's ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > E
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> > Of Brad Ellis
>> > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:37 AM
>> > To: WorkerBee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: Re: Cisco 3560 Switch [bcc][faked-from]
>> >
>> > legally, no, physically, yes. (just like the 3550!) :)
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > Brad Ellis
>> > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
>> > CCSI#30482
>> > Network Learning Inc - A Cisco Learning Partner (CLP) YES! We take
>> > Cisco Learning credits!
>> > brad@ccbootcamp.com
>> > www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training and Advanced Technology Rental
>> > Racks)
>> > Voice: 702-968-5100
>> > FAX: 702-446-8012
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "WorkerBee" <ciscobee@gmail.com>
>> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:09 AM
>> > Subject: Cisco 3560 Switch [bcc][faked-from]
>> >
>> >
>> > > Hi Group,
>> > >
>> > > I am buying 1 more 3560 SMI switch. Anyone knows if I can run EMI
>> > > image on it although the hardware license is for SMI. The same thing
>> > > we did for 3550?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > ____________________________________________________________________
>> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART