From: David Timmons (masterdt@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2006 - 12:20:33 ART
Hi,
What happens if you configure shaping and policing on an interface. Which one takes precedence? I think that this is saying, use policing to set the DSCP values; however, don't drop traffic. Then just do frame-relay adaptive traffic shaping. If so, why would use the different CIR's for the rate-limit? I would think that exceed or not, the traffic will be marked based on the specific access-group.
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
bandwidth 784
ip access-group 143 in
rate-limit output access-group 178 8000 8000 8000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit 48 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 48
rate-limit output access-group 179 8000 8000 8000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit
rate-limit output access-group 180 16000 8000 8000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit 16 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 16
rate-limit output access-group 183 768000 96000 96000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit 18 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 20
no ip route-cache same-interface
no arp frame-relay
no cdp enable
frame-relay class MapClass_1
frame-relay interface-dlci 101
map-class frame-relay MapClass_1
frame-relay cir 1382000
frame-relay bc 13820
frame-relay mincir 784000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
service-policy output mypolicy
policy-map mypolicy c
Class NMC
bandwidth 16
random-detect dscp-based
random-detect exponential-weighting-constant 1
random-detect dscp 16 100 200 10
random-detect dscp 48 200 300 10
class COS3
bandwidth 768
random-detect dscp-based
random-detect exponential-weighting-constant 1
random-detect dscp 18 200 300 10
random-detect dscp 20 50 100 10
class-map match-all NMC
match dscp cs2 cs6
class-map match-all COS3
match dscp af21 af22
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART