From: Eric Hoffman (skeetin@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2006 - 09:45:43 ART
Hi,
If you are signed up for multiple groups, sometimes people fire off an email
to both groups...
ie) security@groupstudy.com and ccielab@groupstudy.com
then you will get two sets of the same email. This is what I occasionally
see...
Perhaps this is the case for you also?
E
>From: "Magmax" <magmax@bigpond.net.au>
>Reply-To: "Magmax" <magmax@bigpond.net.au>
>To: <security@groupstudy.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Duplicate Emails from Group Study
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:05:20 +1000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from groupstudy.com ([209.51.144.7]) by
>bay0-mc7-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 24
>Jul 2006 04:22:41 -0700
>Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by groupstudy.com
>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6OA5jmB003510GroupStudy Mailer;
>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:05:45 -0400
>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k6OA5jp8003508for securityxhiddenx;
>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:05:45 -0400
>Received: from omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com (omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com
>[144.140.93.195]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP
>id k6OA5cQZ003466; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:05:43 -0400
>Received: from daniel ([61.9.150.39]) by omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com with
>ESMTP id <20060724100531.NIWT24880.omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com@daniel>; Mon,
>24 Jul 2006 10:05:31 +0000
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt27U7U8Wht3Un5pi1Hc7tQXFtsD28hD8uA=
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>Thread-Index: AcasyAxy4VAKO+3kRfK7fWQcdlK2dgAABdtAAG0Uo/AAIvNWIA==
>X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
>omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com from [61.9.150.39] using ID magmax@bigpond.net.au
>at Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:05:27 +0000
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by groupstudy.com id
>k6OA5cQZ003466
>X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from magmax@bigpond\.net\.au] (2006/07/24
>06:05:45)
>Precedence: bulk
>Return-Path: nobody@groupstudy.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2006 11:22:41.0656 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[7A3AEF80:01C6AF13]
>
>Guys,
>
>I have been getting duplicate emails from group study. Is there something
>we
>(group study members) can offer to get these fixed????
>
>Regards,
>
>Ubaid
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Scott Morris
>Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 3:24 AM
>To: 'Seffens, Danny '; security@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: FW: Updated Security IE book
>
>I think part of the perception problem is that the GS server seems to be
>sending multiple copies of messages sometimes delayed by hours or a day,
>which is odd.
>
>It makes it hard to keep the threads straight! Although, Shaun appears to
>send two copies of each message from different FROM addresses (one showing
>"Shaun Nicholson", the other with "ccie6705")...
>
>Perhaps Paul (or another moderator) can chime in and look into whatever
>psychotic episode the mail server is having along the way!
>
>But you're right, this has been dealt with, discussed and otherwise rubbed
>in quite well.
>
>
>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
>#153, CISSP, et al.
>CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
>IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>smorris@ipexpert.com
>http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Seffens, Danny
>Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 9:21 AM
>To: security@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: FW: Updated Security IE book
>
>If you guys could take your arguments off line, it would be much
>appreciated.
>
>If anyone needs to know which security books are worthwhile, please read
>the
>archives. This discussion has already been (painfully) had several times
>in
>the recent past.
>
>Digressions like this waste precious cycles.
>
>Danny
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>tdt_cciesec
>Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 8:35 AM
>To: ccie6705; 'Scott Morris'; security@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: FW: Updated Security IE book
>
>Shaun,
>
> You're a not a liar. Several of my colleagues also have issues with
>IPExpert as well.
>
> I don't understand why the people at IPExpert can get their act
>together.
>What
> kind of business are you people running? I thought that since Scott
>Morris has
> become a full-time employee at IPExpert
>(http://www.imakenews.com/ipexpert/e_article000617194.cfm?x=b7K7MM2,b4c5
>s58T
>
>---------------------------------
> ) that things are supposed to be better. Must be wishful thinking on
>my
>part.
>
>ccie6705 <ccie6705@geordiepride.com> wrote:
> Scott please see my forwarded email, check the date, check the email
>address I sent it too, it was obtained by clicking on the link in the
>newsletter. I still dont have the corrected book and dont know why, I am
>not a liar (which is what I feel I am being accused of here) I am simply
>another IPExpert customer who seems to have been forgotten about.
>
>
>
>Shaun Nicholson CCIE 6705
>
>CCNP, CCSP, INFOSEC, JNCIA-M
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shaun Nicholson [mailto:shauninusa@geordiepride.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:31 PM
>To: 'security_update@ipexpert.com'
>Subject: Updated Security IE book
>
>
>
>I bought version 3.0 book about 2 3 months ago via visa credit card.
>
>
>
>Shaun Nicholson CCIE 6705
>
>CCNP, CCSP, INFOSEC, JNCIA-M
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date:
>7/18/2006
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.2/393 - Release Date:
>7/19/2006
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>NOTICE: This message is confidential, intended for the named
>recipient(s) and may contain information that is (i) proprietary to
>the sender, and/or,(ii) privileged, confidential and/or otherwise
>exempt from disclosure under applicable Florida and federal law,
>including, but not limited to, privacy standards imposed pursuant
>to the federal Health insurance Portability and Accountability Act
>of 1996 ("HIPAA"). Receipt by anyone other than the named
>recipient(s) is not a waiver of any applicable privilege. Thank you
>in advance for your compliance with this notice.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART