From: David Timmons (masterdt@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jul 20 2006 - 12:32:35 ART
Hi,
I thought Cisco recommends that we use a BC & Be of 2000000/8*1.5 to accomplish the desired results. From my test, it appears that the lower Bc values can result in a more restricted bandwidth constraints.
dt
----- Original Message ----
From: pankaj kumar <pankaj_mcse123@rediffmail.com>
To: Thunai Selvam(thunai) <thunai@cisco.com>
Cc: security@groupstudy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:28:43 AM
Subject: Re: Rate Limit
Hello Thunai,
The right answer is
rate-limit input access-group 101 2000000
31250 31250 conform-action
transmit exceed-action drop
IF POLICY-MAP
Class-map match-any m
match access-group 101
policy-map p
class-map
m
police cir 2000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
THAT'S
IT..
Regards
Pankaj
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 Thunai Selvam(thunai) wrote :
>Hi
> What is the correct way of doing rate limit i am seeing multiple
>version's
>
>when the question says Bandwidth for a Specific application
should not
>exceed 2Mbps i am seeing Multiple Version.
>
>rate-limit
access-list 101 2000000 24000 32000 confirm-action forward
>exceed-action drop
>
>access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq http
>
>or
>Rate-limit access-list
101 200000 24000 250 confirm-ac forward
>exceed-action drop
>
>2000000/8 =
Kbps ( Excess Burst )
>
>or
>
>Class-map match-any m
> match access-group
101
>
>policy-map p
> class-map m
> police cir 2000000 24000 32000
>
>Inter ser 0/0
>service-pol input p
>
>
>Regds
>Thunai
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART