RE: max-reserved-bandwidth

From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Thu Jul 20 2006 - 09:08:54 ART

• Next message: postmaster@traknet.com: "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
• Previous message: Tim Gregory: "max-reserved-bandwidth"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Gregory: "max-reserved-bandwidth"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes, that is correct, Tim. Welcome aboard!

Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tim Gregory
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:01 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: max-reserved-bandwidth

Hi, (1st post for me! Hello everyone)

Just a quick one, am I right in thinking that the max-reserved-bandwidth
defaults to 75% so you can't oversubscribe your link and break
igp/cdp/control traffic... And changing it is fine providing you take
into account the bandwidth you need?

Thanks

Tim Gregory

• Next message: postmaster@traknet.com: "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
• Previous message: Tim Gregory: "max-reserved-bandwidth"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Gregory: "max-reserved-bandwidth"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART