From: D.H. Williams (draythw@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2006 - 17:02:06 ART
yeah, that works as well. thanks for the reply, like i mentioned, i'm just
looking for options.
On 7/18/06, D.H. Williams <draythw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I apologize as I know this has probably been addressed elsewhere in this
> forum but I can't seem to find anything on it.
>
> My simple question is, besides a distribute-list out or and offset-list,
> what other methods are there to prevent networks you don't want in rip being
> sent to the next-hop. Ex:
>
>
> R1 (with 3 loopbacks 172.16.2.1, 172.16.3.1, 172.16.4.1) connected to R3
> via network 172.16.13.X. On R3, I don't want to see the other 172.16networks.
>
> I'm really just curious if there is a cleaner way of doing this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART