From: Tony Schaffran (tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2006 - 14:45:41 ART
Advanced IP Services includes almost all of the features of 7200 Service
Provider. There are a couple that are not included, but nothing significant
to the Service Provider track.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Stevens [mailto:wrsteve33-gsccie@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:32 AM
To: Scott Morris; tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com; Joshua Lauer; CCIE LAB
Subject: Re: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
Like runing SP code?
----- Original Message ----
From: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
To: tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com; Joshua Lauer <jslauer@hotmail.com>; CCIE
LAB <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:04:20 AM
Subject: RE: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
I think part of what it is is that people whine and complain. No "serious"
SP will be using 2600's and 2800's or 3600/3700/3800 in the core of their
network. Some people simply cannot separate a testing environment from the
real thing despite the fact that technologies (as tested) work the same
either place.
The use of the 7200 would make it more "real". Other than that, I'm at a
loss. There are some extra features, at least with the likes of the NP-1GE
or NP-2G processors... But otherwise, unless they're going to bring in some
OSR7600's ESR10K's or GSR12K's I don't think there will be any sort of major
difference in the lab other than topology and sheer number of interfaces.
*shrug* Just my viewpoint. Unless they have something incredibly heinous
in mind that I just haven't thought of yet! ;)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Schaffran [mailto:tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:07 AM
To: swm@emanon.com; 'Joshua Lauer'; 'CCIE LAB'
Subject: RE: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
That is probably more likely the reason I guess, but SONET interfaces have
been around for a while like the 7200. Why now highlight the 7200?
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:57 AM
To: 'Joshua Lauer'; 'Tony Schaffran'; 'CCIE LAB'
Subject: RE: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
And perhaps the introduction of other exciting interface types like SONET?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joshua Lauer
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:49 AM
To: Tony Schaffran; 'CCIE LAB'
Subject: Re: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
L2TPV3 ?
Afaik the 2800 doesnt support it
jl
Joshua Lauer
CCIE#16024
CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, CCIP, RHCE, INFOSEC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Schaffran" <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>
To: "'CCIE LAB'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: Introduction of the 7200 for the SP lab???
> Can somebody explain to me why cisco is singling
> out this router for their
> SP lab? What can this particular router do that a
> 2800 cannot do in a lab
> environment? I know the performance differences,
> but is there a fundamental
> difference in the IOS?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART