From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2006 - 03:36:21 ART
802.1x requires AV pair, so, only 1 choice "Radius".
On 7/18/06, Alex De Gruiter (AU) <Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au> wrote:
> I don't believe that TACACS supports 802.1x, although I could be wrong.
>
> I found that Cisco Secure ACS 4.0 works well (no, this isn't a sales
> pitch!!!)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Cacca Mucca
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2006 4:24 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Radius or Tacacs
>
> Newie question.
>
> What would work best when rolling out a 802.1X authentication network, a
> radius or a tacacs server?
>
> And, what platform would work best?
>
>
> TIA
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ******************************************************************************
> - NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA
> This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
>
> Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments.
> ******************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART