From: Elmer Hall (Elmer.Hall@vaci.com)
Date: Mon Jul 17 2006 - 12:10:29 ART
Why not this?
map-class frame-relay RTP
Frame ip rtp priority lowerbound range MaxBW
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tony
Paterra
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:57 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: match rtp audio vs. acl udp 16374 32767 (PQ for voice)
All,
I ran across a QoS question asking me to prioritize voice traffic on a FR
link (that was using a map-class for FRTS) and saw two ways of doing it...
The first involves taking a MQC class-map and doing
"match protocol rtp audio"
and the second way involved creating an ACL on UDP port numbers 16374
through 32767.
Are these both correct? Is there any functional differences in the way NBAR
picks off RTP audio streams?
-- Tony Paterra apaterra@gmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART