From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jul 17 2006 - 01:07:31 ART
In my mind (travel weary as it may be) the phrase "all subnets below" means
more specific mask (hence the idea of SUBnets)...
197.0.0.0/8
197.0.0.0/9
197.128.0.0/9
197.0.0.0/10
197.64.0.0/10
197.128.0.0/10
197.192.0.0/10
etc.
Scott
_____
From: Elias Chari [mailto:elias.chari@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 3:11 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Stavros Filargyropoulos; masterdt@yahoo.com; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: All Subnet below.
Is this what the question asks?
I thought it was for nets le /8....
On 7/16/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
197.0.0.0/8 ge 9 ?
That'll give /9 /10 /11 ... /32
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Stavros Filargyropoulos
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 10:57 AM
To: masterdt@yahoo.com
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: All Subnet below.
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback
What if we change the prefix to 197.
Receive all Subnets prefix below 197.0.0.0/8
tia
*Stav.
On 7/14/06, David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm,
>
> I would vote for 0.0.0.0/0 le 7. Not sure if can include 0.0.0.0 as a
> subnet less then 128; but, it is a prefix below 128.0.0.0.
>
> dt
>
>
> --- Stavros Filargyropoulos <f.stavros@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > How this is configured?
> > Receive all Subnets prefix below 128.0.0.0/8
> >
> > ip prefix-list BELOW permit 128.0.0.0/1 le 8 ?
> > or
> > ip prefix-list BELOW permit 128.0.0.0/8 le 32
> >
> > ?
> >
> >
> > tia
> > *Stav.
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART