From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sat Jul 15 2006 - 18:56:55 ART
OT: There is a great explanation of that in Internetwork Experts Class on
Demand.
How can I say that the Brians Stress that point out to the maximum level,
with Life routers configuration
My 2 Cents
Victor
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de James
Ventre
Enviado el: Sabado, 15 de Julio de 2006 05:45 p.m.
Para: spycharlies@hotmail.com
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Re: GLBP Load Balancing ?
You would want to use it if you needed to utilize the bandwidth on more
than one of the links leaving your local segment.
There are plenty of reasons NOT to use it. One of them is that it
removes the deterministic nature of HSRP and complicates troubleshooting
.... like when a server admin can't ping their default gateway. With
HSRP, I know which router they are trying to reach, and can skip a bunch
of troubleshooting steps. With GLBP I have to start figuring out what
MAC he was given for his GW ... then start the process. KISS goes a
long way in networking.
James
spycharlies@hotmail.com wrote:
> Am trying to understand a scenerio in which GLBP was prefered over HSRP.
>
> ...from cisco documentation
> ----------------------------
> "GLBP differs from Cisco Hot Standby Redundancy Protocol (HSRP) and IETF
RFC 3768 Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) in that it has the
ability to load balance over multiple gateways. Like HSRP and VRRP an
election occurs, but rather than a single active router winning the election
GLBP elects an Active Virtual Gateway (AVG). The job of the AVG is to assign
virtual MAC addresses to each of the other GLBP routers and to assign each
network host to one of the GLBP routers."
>
> Does anyone have a better explanation, why i would use GLBP over HSRP??
>
> cheers
> Uyota
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART