From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2006 - 16:59:35 ART
Thanks for the clarification
That is what Scott Morris wrote on that Link
The "reflector port" needs to be a port not used for anything else live.
It utilizes the ASICs and general logic of the port in order to span
onto the VLAN. This precludes the port from participating in other live
functions.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Robert Crowe [mailto:rwcrowe@nc.rr.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 14 de Julio de 2006 03:55 p.m.
Para: 'Victor Cappuccio'; 'Kay D'
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: RSPAN reflector port
Victor,
Unless something has recently changed then you do not have to have
"switchport access vlan xxx" on the reflector port. The reflector port just
needs to be an unused interface.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:21 PM
To: 'Kay D'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RSPAN reflector port
Yes.
Check out
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200303/msg01075.html
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Kay D
Enviado el: Viernes, 14 de Julio de 2006 03:12 p.m.
Para: Cisco certification
Asunto: RSPAN reflector port
Hi ,
Is it necessary to assign the reflector port to a remote span VLAN
using "sw acc vlan _" ? .
tia,
kAY d
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART