From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2006 - 12:30:13 ART
Sorry for being late, once again catching up, but...
IPV6 guys are the ones claiming that NAT is all evil and you want to get
rid of it, but in the mean time, NAT does serve some other purpouses,
most notably security by hiding. So even if the primary goal (lack of
address remedial) is no longer one, NAT might still have its uses.
BTW, how do pixen support IPv6 ? :) Most cnfiguration guides assume
you work in IPv4...
Scott Morris @ 26/06/2006 02:28 -0300 dixit:
> You only have about 340 bazillion addresses and you want to translate them?
> ;)
>
> Check out:
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/ipv6
> _c/sa_natpt.htm
>
> Specifically that's for 6-4 or 4-6 translation, which is all you SHOULD need
> to be doing!
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Radioactive Frog
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 4:55 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPV6 nat support
>
> Hi Group,
> Just wondering, does IPv6 supports NAT ?
>
> Frog,
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART