From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2006 - 12:20:14 ART
Aamir,
If you have the time, read RFC 791....
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/98aug/I-D/draft-ietf-diffserv-precedence-00.
txt
RFC 791 reserve IP precedence values 6 & 7 for control traffics like routing
protocols, etc.
HTH
Godswill Oletu
CCIE #16464(R&S),CCNP,CCDP,CCSP,INFOSEC.
>>>
----- Original Message -----
From: Aamir Aziz
To: Godswill Oletu
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Ip Precedence or DSCP
Hi there Godswill
I see what you mean but why set-prec-transmit 5? I mean max value of Ip
precedenc is 7 right? So why use 5 here?
thanks
Aamir
On 7/7/06, Godswill Oletu <oletu@inbox.lv> wrote:
Aamir,
If there is no restriction or leading toward a particular solution, then
any
of them should be fine. Rememeber that ip precedence over laps with the
DSCP.
So something like:
..... conform-action set-dscp-transmit 46 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit
46
OR
..... conform-action set-prec-transmit 5 exceed-action set-prec-transmit
5
Are good candidates, when in doubt do ask the proctor and do not forget to
enable or confirm that 'ip cef' is enabled.
HTH.
Godswill Oletu
CCIE #16464
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aamir Aziz" <aamiraz77@gmail.com >
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 5:41 AM
Subject: Ip Precedence or DSCP
> Hello ppl,
>
> I have a small question. If there is a CAR question which says
Prioritize
> tcp traffic with MAX PRIORITY so are we going to use Ip Precedence or
DSCP?
> and what values?
>
> Thanks
> Aamir
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART