Re: IEWBv3 Lab 12, FR QoS Question

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2006 - 11:36:54 ART


A good one :)

Check this article, to see some detailed discussion of this
"problem" ;)

http://www.networkcomputing.com/811/811ws1.html

I would personally stick with 1536, if task specifically points
out that we work with T1 circuit.

HTH

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
petr@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Outside US: 775-826-4344

2006/7/7, Radoslav Vasilev <deckland@gmail.com>: > > Hi Group, > > I want to make sure not to lose points on the exam for stupid doubts like > the following: > > In the lab mentioned above, R4 has three PVC to routers R1, R2 and R5. > The QoS section question asks for R4 to shape the PVC to R2 to 512kbit/s. > The physical interface that all three pvc are using is of T1 speed. > The task also asks for the remaining two PVC to share equally the > remaining > interface bandwidth. > > Now, in the task solution, the three frame-relay map-classes are > configured > (all of them) with ``frame-relay cir 512000``. > > Shouldn't the remaining two PVC be configured with 516kbit/s CIR, as the > T1 > interface bandiwdh is 1544kbit/s, so the remaining bandiwth for the two > PVC > is supposed to be 1544 - 512 = 1032 kbit/s and therefore each of the > remaining two PVC should have 516kbit/s? > > Thanks for your opinions! > Rado > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART