From: Aamir Aziz (aamiraz77@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:29:23 ART
Hi there Godswill
I see what you mean but why set-prec-transmit 5? I mean max value of Ip
precedenc is 7 right? So why use 5 here?
thanks
Aamir
On 7/7/06, Godswill Oletu <oletu@inbox.lv> wrote:
>
> Aamir,
>
> If there is no restriction or leading toward a particular solution, then
> any
> of them should be fine. Rememeber that ip precedence over laps with the
> DSCP.
>
> So something like:
>
> ..... conform-action set-dscp-transmit 46 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit
> 46
>
> OR
>
> ..... conform-action set-prec-transmit 5 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 5
>
> Are good candidates, when in doubt do ask the proctor and do not forget to
> enable or confirm that 'ip cef' is enabled.
>
> HTH.
>
> Godswill Oletu
> CCIE #16464
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aamir Aziz" <aamiraz77@gmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 5:41 AM
> Subject: Ip Precedence or DSCP
>
>
> > Hello ppl,
> >
> > I have a small question. If there is a CAR question which says
> Prioritize
> > tcp traffic with MAX PRIORITY so are we going to use Ip Precedence or
> DSCP?
> > and what values?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Aamir
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART