From: Salau,Olayemi (Olayemi.Salau@southampton.gov.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 27 2006 - 12:52:19 ART
Yea,
I've found what the problem is actually:
Cisco says you can't apply policy maps that have class-maps based on a
set or trust object also on class-maps that are based on ACLs. In my
scenario, I've got the class-map ratelimit_class set up with an
access-group/ACL
I'm sure your test doesn't have ACL for the class-map. I really
appreciate your help on this, now I will have to take another shortcut
to solve the potential problem on ground
Cheers mate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Schulz, Dave [mailto:DSchulz@dpsciences.com]
Sent: 27 June 2006 16:48
To: Salau,Olayemi
Subject: RE: Service-Policy output on 3550 switch and 6506
What messages did you get when you tried to apply the policy to the
interface (and in which direction). It seems to work on my 3550.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Salau,Olayemi [mailto:Olayemi.Salau@southampton.gov.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:16 AM
To: Schulz, Dave
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: Service-Policy output on 3550 switch and 6506
!
For the
6506:--------------------------------------------------------------
!
class-map match-all ratelimit_class
match access-group name ratelimit_ACL
class-map match-all ratelimit_ACL
!
!
policy-map ratelimit_policy_8mb
class ratelimit_class
police 8000000 250000 250000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
drop
policy-map ratelimit_policy_2mb
class ratelimit_class
police 2000000 62500 62500 conform-action transmit exceed-action
drop
policy-map ratelimit_policy_4mb
class ratelimit_class
police 4000000 125000 125000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
drop
policy-map match
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet4/23
ip address 192.168.250.41 255.255.255.252
speed 10
duplex full
service-policy input ratelimit_policy_2mb
!
For the
3550:--------------------------------------------------------------
!
!
class-map match-all ratelimit_class
match access-group name ratelimit_ACL
!
!
policy-map ratelimit_policy_2mb
class ratelimit_class
police 2000000 62500 exceed-action drop
policy-map ratelimit_policy_4mb
class ratelimit_class
police 4000000 10000 exceed-action drop
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
no switchport
ip address 192.168.109.1 255.255.255.0
!
-----Original Message-----
From: Schulz, Dave [mailto:DSchulz@dpsciences.com]
Sent: 27 June 2006 16:09
To: Salau,Olayemi; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: Service-Policy output on 3550 switch and 6506
Salau -
This should not be an issue. However, you have to take a look at what
you are applying to the FastEthernet ports and also, what direction you
are applying it. Here is a quick config that works.... Can you forward
the specific config that you are having an issue with?
policy-map TEST
class class-default
trust cos
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport mode dynamic desirable
service-policy input TEST
Dave Schulz
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Salau,Olayemi
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:51 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Service-Policy output on 3550 switch and 6506
Hi Guys,
Trying to apply service-policy in the output direction on fastethernet
ports for a 6506 and 3550 Switch.
The 6506 has got IOS version 12.1(26)E on it
The 3550 Switch has got 12.1(19)EA1c on it
Is it that FastEthernet Ports don't support service-policy output
command or is there an alternative way of doing this. I noticed the
service-policy output command being used a lot in IEWB, but mostly on
Serial interfaces. Some suggested srr-queue as an option to police pkts
Many Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART