From: Mienbaikebi Patani (patmien@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 24 2006 - 09:47:08 ART
It does not matter which activities you perform first. The only principle I
want you to put in mind when perforning redistribution is the following. For
example when you enter the following sequence of commands;
router rip
redistribute ospf X metric 2
the OSPF redistribution command within RIP causes the router to look into
the routing table and pick up all entries that have been learnt by OSPF
(both IA, E1&2, N1&2), and then all the networks that the interfaces on
which OSPF has been enabled are also picked up for advertisement by RIP. So
two things happen in the nutshell;
(1) pick up all entries found in the routing table learnt through the
routing process redistributed.
(2) check for the interfaces on which the redistributed routing process is
enabled and then advertise the prefixes that these interfaces are connected
to.
These same activities happen whenever you perform redistribution on most
routing protocols.
Hope this was informative?
On 6/22/06, forwardtruth@yahoo.com <forwardtruth@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> With a router that runs two Routing protocol (RIP and OSPF),with two ways
> redistribsome I found that "directly connected netwroks" either are
> redistributed into RIP (Lab 6 Task 4.8 R3) or OSPF (for example see Lab 4
> Task 4.8 R4, Lab7 Task 4.8 R1,2,3 ).
>
> Does it matter if I redistribute first "directly connected netwroks" into
> RIP, then redistribute RIP into OSPF or I redistribute first "directly
> connected netwroks" into OSPF, then redistribute OSPF into RIP ??
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART