From: Kay D (krsna83@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 06:54:34 ART
Hi SHanky,
The task is to make R1 active without using Priority
and preempt hence highest ip address could be used .Thanks ,Kay .
On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Glad it worked, so the task must have a wording like R1 should be the
> active router and not what you mentioned that R1's priority should be higher
> without using ..any commands on any routers.
>
> Is it? Coz the HSRP election would be won by
> 1. Priority
> 2. IP address of the I/F.
>
> So, if you want R1 to be Active for HSRP, either it should have higher
> priority or higher IP address.
>
> Do let me know if the Task clearly says to increase the priority without
> using the preemt or priority commands ? or does it say only to ensure R1 is
> the active router ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Shanky
>
>
> On 6/19/06, jhtemail <jhtemail@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest HRSP must have a backup condition in case of a tie in
> > priority. Maybe something like manipulating the IP Address of the
> > interface,
> > something like the higher IP Address wins. Someone else may have a
> > better
> > idea but check your other options there may be a way to tip the balance.
> > Could also try playing with the MAC Address setting. Setup HRSP see
> > which
> > one becomes Active, then see what you need to manipulate to switch it to
> > the
> > other. For testing reasons use the pre-empt command and when you have
> > cracked it take out the pre-empt command and set the system up as
> > requested
> > in the question.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Kay
> > D
> > Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 7:00 PM
> > To: Shanky
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
> >
> > Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on
> > neither
> > routers .
> > Any other way out ????
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher priority....without
> > using
> > > the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other router on
> > the
> > > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's priority
> > higher
> > > without using the command on R1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope it helps
> > >
> > > Shanky
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without using
> >
> > > standy priority or preempt .
> > >
> > > Thanks ,
> > > Kay D
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART