From: jhtemail (jhtemail@yahoo.com.au)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 06:28:56 ART
I would suggest HRSP must have a backup condition in case of a tie in
priority. Maybe something like manipulating the IP Address of the interface,
something like the higher IP Address wins. Someone else may have a better
idea but check your other options there may be a way to tip the balance.
Could also try playing with the MAC Address setting. Setup HRSP see which
one becomes Active, then see what you need to manipulate to switch it to the
other. For testing reasons use the pre-empt command and when you have
cracked it take out the pre-empt command and set the system up as requested
in the question.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Kay
D
Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 7:00 PM
To: Shanky
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on neither
routers .
Any other way out ????
On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher priority....without using
> the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other router on the
> segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's priority higher
> without using the command on R1.
>
>
> Hope it helps
>
> Shanky
>
>
> On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without using
> standy priority or preempt .
>
> Thanks ,
> Kay D
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART