From: Kay D (krsna83@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 06:15:42 ART
Hi, the highest router 's ip address would have a better priority when there
is a tie .
Thanks,
Kay D
On 6/19/06, Russell Kelly (rukelly) <rukelly@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Interface tracking or object tracking?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Kay D
> Sent: 19 June 2006 10:00
> To: Shanky
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
>
> Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on
> neither routers .
> Any other way out ????
>
>
>
> On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher priority....without
> > using the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other
> > router on the
> > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's priority
> > higher without using the command on R1.
> >
> >
> > Hope it helps
> >
> > Shanky
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without using
>
> > standy priority or preempt .
> >
> > Thanks ,
> > Kay D
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART