Re: Lab 9 Frame-relay Solution Task 2.1 IEWB V3 VII

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Jun 18 2006 - 16:11:40 ART

• Next message: loke: "R&S Lab Date"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: 3550 Queuing Details"
• Maybe in reply to: Victor Cappuccio: "Lab 9 Frame-relay Solution Task 2.1 IEWB V3 VII"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Oh, thanks, Victor, I get your point now :)

Excellent, this is even better then I thought :)

Anyway, if you don't get unneeded mappings after
implementing your solutions, you did it right.

Just some overconfiguration would not hurt sometimes,
but that's not really necessary in this case, IMO :)

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
petr@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

• Next message: loke: "R&S Lab Date"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: 3550 Queuing Details"
• Maybe in reply to: Victor Cappuccio: "Lab 9 Frame-relay Solution Task 2.1 IEWB V3 VII"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART