From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2006 - 15:47:28 ART
I mean it did shock me quite a bit and I think the guy
next to me as well as I hustled to save my configs
before I made a mad dash to the proctor.
I had a couple of issues that were tripping me up a
bit anyway and I am not typically that petty.
The whole event costed me only about 5 minutes or
less, I could argue about shaking up my game plan and
I still have to wonder if it did not affect on one
item I was having trouble with, but hey, I'll mention
it in my critique, but I am not typically a big
complainer or that petty.
I was very pleased with the way that Howard handled
it, and I thought he did it very with a very cool and
colected manner.
The guy was a professional all the way.
I've heard others say not so much to them and I guess
that everyone has their own experience and stories.
Later...
--- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> Things like that are generally fun to say AFTER you
> have already passed that
> lab. :) But yes, it would be an entertaining idea.
> Although antivirus
> stuff isn't part of the CCIE Security blueprint!
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mark
> Lasarko
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: ciscocciein2006@gmail.com; darbyweaver@yahoo.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Upp_and_Upp@hotmail.com;
> oletu@inbox.lv
> Subject: Re: The Worm at RTP
>
> Sounds interesting to me - more fun and less evil!
> I think that would be a *great* way to start your
> morning.
> Defeat the worm to start your lab - LOL :) I may be
> ill, but it sounds like
> fun to me!
> ~M
>
>
> >>> Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> 06/16/06
> 12:20 PM >>>
>
> I'm pretty sure that it was totally unexpected.
>
> Also, let me reiterate the tests appear to be very
> fair.
>
> I would not think the Security exam would be
> otherwise.
>
>
>
> --- CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Are you sure that wasn't purposely planted there
> for the Security lab
> > folks
> > :-)
> >
> > On 6/16/06, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Just looked like a typical buffer overflow...
> > >
> > > The lsass.exe message and your machine will shut
> > down
> > > in 60 seconds followed by the countdown.
> > >
> > > It did mess up my concentration especially since
> > we
> > > were told that the PCs were locked down pretty
> > tighly.
> > >
> > > I did not evaluate it further to tell you
> exaclty which variant it
> > > was. I was there to take the
> > lab,
> > > after all...
> > >
> > > Although, I do consider myself fairly
> > knowledgeable on
> > > worms in general.
> > >
> > > I was going to be majorly concerned if I had
> > suffered
> > > a second reboot.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART