Re: paranoid filtering - mutual redistibution with no loop

From: Pierre-Alex (paguanel@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2006 - 15:32:14 ART

Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Multicast"
Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: BGP AS Path Access List and Filter List Question"
Maybe in reply to: Pierre-Alex: "paranoid filtering - mutual redistibution with no loop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

OK, thanks!
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Petr Lapukhov
  To: Pierre-Alex
  Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
  Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:24 PM
  Subject: Re: paranoid filtering - mutual redistibution with no loop

Almost certainly not.

The main thing people usually forget, is that you should do what
you are TOLD to do, conforming to RESTRICTIONS.

  If you are told to provide connectivity - provide it :) If you are
instructed
  to take care of "future" potential loops (in case if another point of
redistribution
  is added), take care.

The best way to solve a task, is to figure a way how it could be most
probably
VERIFIED. That cuts all the unnecessary configuration lines.

After all, they judge by RESULT. Don't waste you time doing more stuff
than it is required :)

HTH

  --
  Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
  petr@internetworkexpert.com

  Internetwork Expert, Inc.
  http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
  Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
  Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
  24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
  Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Multicast"
Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: BGP AS Path Access List and Filter List Question"
Maybe in reply to: Pierre-Alex: "paranoid filtering - mutual redistibution with no loop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART