RE: FRTS or Policy-map

From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2006 - 11:54:26 ART


Kay -

In the Frame-relay scenario (random-detect), you will need to use the
map-class with the GTS interface command for traffic shaping, or, use
the policy-map within the map-class (service policy) to do the same.
Both could be applied to the interface or the DLCI.

Dave Schulz
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kay D
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Mienbaikebi Patani
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: FRTS or Policy-map

Also if we need to police traffic coming into a specific DLCI we need
to do
policing and FRTS on the same interface(by applying a map-class frame)
.

Kay D

On 6/14/06, Mienbaikebi Patani <patmien@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you want to make bandwidth reservation and then alos enable random
> detect on specific traffic class, you can apply the Policy-map
directly to
> the main serial interface since you have only one active dlci. But if
you
> want to make it specific to the dlci, you have to apply the Policy-map
to a
> Map-Class and then apply it directly to the specific dlci using the
> frame-relay interface-dlci command and then enable traffic shapping.
>
>
> On 6/14/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> In an NBMA serial interface(WITH ONLY ONE DLCI) ,to set a
bandwidth
> percent out and to do RANDOMDETECT on select packets ,
>
> a.)should i apply the policy-map directly on the interface
>
> or
>
> b.)should i apply it on a "map-class frame" and then apply it onto a
> specific DLCI or the interface itself (since we have only one DLCI)
>
> "b" would bring up FRTS into it .
>
>
>
> But the since the question does not mention FRTS should i do it the
"b"
> way
> or "a" is sufficient provided there is not difference in their
working ?
>
>
> TIA
> Kay
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART