RE: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include

From: Carlos Campos Torres \(ccampost\) (ccampost@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Jun 08 2006 - 22:37:23 ART

• Next message: Rick Fox: "WRR question"
• Previous message: juchj: "Re: Which BRAS ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Popgeorgiev Nikolay: "Special Vlans - should or should NOT include"
• Next in thread: Popgeorgiev Nikolay: "RE: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think you shouldn't use them. Why would you want to though?
VTP and STP traffic will get forwarded anyway and token ring and fddi
vlans are not really needed

Please let me know if somebody thinks different on this one

Carlos
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Popgeorgiev Nikolay
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:03 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include

 Dear all,

I have a doubt about when the task requires to allow only the used vlans
over the trunk link(s), should I include also vlan 1 and vlans from 1002
- 1005. Do we really need them.

Thanks
Nick

• Next message: Rick Fox: "WRR question"
• Previous message: juchj: "Re: Which BRAS ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Popgeorgiev Nikolay: "Special Vlans - should or should NOT include"
• Next in thread: Popgeorgiev Nikolay: "RE: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART