From: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Date: Wed Jun 07 2006 - 07:00:35 ART
How am I supposed to know if I should use
traffic-shape adapt-fecn (GTS)
or
frame-relay adaptive-shaping (FRTS)
The document says BECN is used in "frame-relay adaptive-shaping", but
"traffic-shape adapt-fecn" turns a FECN into a BECN.
So, FRTS is weaker? Doesn't turn FECN into BECN? GTS is prefered ?
But, if you just want to react to BECN, FRTS is good enough?
However, "traffic-shape adapt-fecn" doesn't even say if it reacts to BECN.
However, if it doesn't react to BECN, why even bother to say it "adapt" to any thing?
Are we going to do wording style match-up in the lab ?
5 days left to my 3rd attempt. This is very painful. 6 o'clock in the morning. 9 o'clock going to office to be a software engineer dealing with class destructor.
What am I doing ????
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART