From: Carlos Campos Torres \(ccampost\) (ccampost@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2006 - 13:12:27 ART
Hi Feras,
I usually put the ip multicast boundary command on my last-hop's
upstream neighbor, in the case we don't want that last-hop router to get
the traffic.
So it would be something like this:
R3========R5--- Source 224.1.1.1
I
I
R1
I would place my boundary on R3 so that R1 doesn't get that traffic if
that's what you want to do.
Hope this helps.
Carlos Campos
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Feras Abunamous (fabunamo)
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ip multicast boundary
All,
I implemented a multicast lab scenario and I configured the "ip
multicast boundary" command. It did not stop it from receiving the
multicast ping echo-replys. Even that I configured the access list to
match the group. Are there any specifications on where we should place
this command?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART