From: rocco ****** (roccor21@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2006 - 15:45:14 ART
Hi Leigh,
Even with FRTS I am not getting any hits on my policy map for DLSw, I'm
not worried about the CIR, bc, be at this point as I want to be able to
get matches on my policy first:
sho policy-map interface
Serial0/0.31: DLCI 31 -
Service-policy output: EFT
Class-map: DLSW (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: access-group 111
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
Queueing
Strict Priority
Output Queue: Conversation 24
Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Burst 200 (Bytes)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
2088 packets, 197401 bytes
5 minute offered rate 1000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
Serial0/0.33: DLCI 33 -
Service-policy output: EFT
Class-map: DLSW (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: access-group 111
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
Queueing
Strict Priority
Output Queue: Conversation 24
Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Burst 200 (Bytes)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
897 packets, 91349 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
version 12.3
!
ip cef
!
!
!
!
!
!
class-map match-any DLSW
match access-group 111
!
!
policy-map EFT
class DLSW
priority 8
!
!
!
interface Loopback5
ip address
!
interface Serial0/0
bandwidth 128
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
no fair-queue
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/0.31 point-to-point
bandwidth 64
frame-relay interface-dlci 31
class DLSW
!
interface Serial0/0.33 point-to-point
bandwidth 64
frame-relay interface-dlci 33
class DLSW
!
!
ip local policy route-map DLSW
!
!
!
map-class frame-relay DLSW
service-policy output EFT
!
route-map DLSW permit 10
!
QA_RTR#sho dlsw pee
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
TCP 172.20.254.3 CONNECT 2283073 30840 conf 0 0
0 1w3d
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Leigh Harrison <ccileigh@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Leigh Harrison <ccileigh@gmail.com>
To: rocco ****** <roccor21@hotmail.com>
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: real word and lab CBWFQ-LLQ
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:41:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
bay0-mc8-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:44:55 -0700
Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id k55HirEf030615;Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:44:53
-0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
k55HgBPd030572for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2006
13:42:11 -0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
k55HgEan022634GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:42:14 -0400
Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k55HgEVO022632for
ccielabxhiddenx; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:42:14 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com
[66.249.82.200]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with
ESMTP id k55HgDfS022611 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:42:13
-0400
Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s19so855792wxc for
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.71.12 with SMTP id t12mr6323721wxa; Mon, 05 Jun
2006 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [86.143.20.84]) by mx.gmail.com with
ESMTP id h11sm151234wxd.2006.06.05.10.42.09; Mon, 05 Jun 2006
10:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
>Hey there Rocco,
>
>I did this not so long back for a customer of mine. You're missing
>a few command to get it working properly. The key one being:-
>"frame-relay traffic-shaping" on the main serial interface.
>
>**BE WARNED** When you do this, it will set the cir on the
>interfaces to around 64k - this is something I found out after I'd
>implemented the change!! So I wrote some frame-relay map classes to
>specify the cir, etc for each interface.
>
>I also read something very interesting from Cisco where they say
>that your CIR should be set to you given rate from the service
>provider and that your CIR from the service provider should be
>configured as your mincir. A document which has since been moved on
>CCO. I'll send it you if you want it.
>
>LH
>
>
>rocco ****** wrote:
>>I'm trying to set up LLQ for DLSw. I tried using NBAR but it
>>doesn't
>>seem to be giving matches. Then I tried just using a simple
>>extened ACL
>>but no luck. I think its because it's considered a tunnel and from
>>what
>>I see it needs to be classified differently. I'm thinking of using
>>an ip
>>local policy. Also tring to figure out how to do this for other
>>directly
>>generated router traffic for lab practice. Any suggestions...
>>QA_RTR#sho
>>policy-map EFT
>>Policy Map EFT
>>Class DLSW
>>Strict Priority
>>Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Burst 200 (Bytes)
>>QA_RTR#sho policy-map int
>>QA_RTR#sho policy-map interface s0/0 Serial0/0 Service-policy
>>output:
>>EFT Class-map: DLSW (match-all)
>>0 packets, 0 bytes
>>5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>Match: access-group 111
>>Queueing
>>Strict Priority
>>Output Queue: Conversation 40
>>Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Burst 200 (Bytes)
>>(pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
>>(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0 Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>>21288 packets, 2378945 bytes
>>5 minute offered rate 1000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>Match: any
>>#show run ip cef
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>class-map match-all DLSW
>>match access-group 111
>>!
>>!
>>policy-map EFT
>>class DLSW
>>priority 8
>>!
>>!
>>dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.x.x.xdlsw remote-peer 0 tcp
>>172.x.x.xdlsw
>>remote-peer 0 tcp 172.x.x.xdlsw bridge-group 69
>>!
>>!
>>interface Loopback5
>> ip address 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.255
>>!
>>interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.224
>> no ip proxy-arp
>> backup delay 10 0
>> backup interface FastEthernet0/1
>> speed 100
>> full-duplex
>> bridge-group 69
>> bridge-group 69 spanning-disabled
>>!
>>interface Serial0/0
>> bandwidth 128
>> no ip address
>> ip nbar protocol-discovery
>> service-policy output EFT
>> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
>> no ip mroute-cache
>> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>>!
>>interface Serial0/0.31 point-to-point
>>ip add x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 bandwidth 64
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 31 !
>>interface Serial0/0.33 point-to-point
>>ip add x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
>> bandwidth 64
>>
>>!
>>interface FastEthernet0/1
>> ip address 10.x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 no ip proxy-arp
>> speed 100
>> full-duplex
>> bridge-group 69
>> bridge-group 69 spanning-disabled
>>!
>>interface Serial0/1
>> no ip address
>> shutdown
>>!
>>
>>ip local policy route-map DLSW
>>access-list 111 permit tcp any host 172.20.254.3 eq 1981
>>access-list 111 permit tcp any host 172.20.254.3 eq 1982
>>access-list 111 permit tcp any host 172.20.254.3 eq 1983
>>access-list 111 permit tcp any host 172.20.254.3 eq 2065
>>access-list 111 permit tcp any host 172.20.254.3 eq 2067
>>!
>>route-map DLSW permit 10
>>!
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART