From: Faryar Zabihi \(fzabihi\) (fzabihi@cisco.com)
Date: Sun Jun 04 2006 - 17:43:49 ART
But sometimes you need it to be external route...u can usually tell..maybe not
on that task but a later task. So look ahead. You might get a routing table
output in a task and it has that loopback(probably has nothing to do with that
task but a clue for the other). Take it from there...Duncan makes a very good
point. Only allow what you want. Why would you allow a whole subnet with a
network statement. I have seen people doing practice labs using network
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a X
That will land you right in it.
-----Original Message-----
From: hcb@gettcomm.com [mailto:hcb@gettcomm.com]
Sent: Sun Jun 04 16:16:53 2006
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: ospf
Quoting Duncan Maccubbin <duncan.maccubbin@earthlink.net>:
> If they say you can't use network then redistribution probably will not
> work. The wording I tend to see is put network w.x.y.z in ospf area X
without
> using the network command.
While, sadly, this may be a workbook question and, even worse, suggestive of
a
live lab problem, it's an insane thing to do. With one special-case
exception,
I've found it wise -- as have many people in large, complex networks --
ALWAYS
to use network with a mask of 0.0.0.0.
The more you allow wide-scope OSPF masks, automatic redistribitution, etc.,
the
more you expose yourself to questionable information leaking into routing
protocols, and the more difficult you make troubleshooting.
>This would tell me A) redistribution is probably
> not what they are looking for. B) I would go with interface command IP OSPF
1
> AREA X
>
> Now if an area is not specified then redistribution is all good.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Pierre-Alex <paguanel@hotmail.com>
> >Sent: Jun 4, 2006 11:17 AM
> >To: Sami <sy1977@gmail.com>, Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: ospf
> >
> >Sami,
> >
> >Use the simplest method.
> >
> >If they tell you not to use "network" then use redistributed
> >
> >otherwise use "network"
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Pierre
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sami" <sy1977@gmail.com>
> >To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 5:01 PM
> >Subject: ospf
> >
> >
> >> What is the best way of advertising loopback address in ospf , via
network
> >> command or redistribute connected command ?
> >> I always use network command but I have seen some of workbook use
> >> redistribut connected for loopbacks.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >> Sami
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART