From: Faryar Zabihi \(fzabihi\) (fzabihi@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 02:28:43 ART
This is a automated message. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY.
You have reached your email limit. You may not send out another email to
this mailer for 24 hours.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
darbyweaver@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 12:26 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Assessor Lab versus Real LAB (degree of difficulty)
Since I have yet to have gone to the lab it s hard to say for sure.
Now with that behind us:
I would think that since the CCIE ACCESSOR is supposed to be written by
the sam team that writes the actual procotored lab exams that the
similarity in questions and degree of difficulty and point assignments
are about on an even par.
Recall the CCIE ACCESSSOR has some things down for you already, and
these are things, you could miss in your lab, even though they are
relatively routine items. The Devil is in the Details.
I would say that from my personal experience, I got a pretty good
indicator of how I would deal with topics in the lab.
The ACCESSOR gave me some items, I ahd not seem yet or stretched my
toolkit in terms of how to approach certain technologies and some
caveates t be more aware of, etc.
But the same can be said for the NMC CheckIT Labs as well as the
InternetworkExpert Mock Labs.
I would think the CCIE ASSESSOR is on par with easier (easiest)labs from
these two vendors whom ost here are familiar with.
There are some things that can throw you for a loop.
Knowing several people who have attempted it, I would say it has been a
very exact gauge for some who took their lab soon after, and some
reportedly scored higher on it and then subsequently failed the lab.
Mileage varies.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:31 ART