Re: multicast boundry versus igmp access-group

From: Petr Lapukhov (petrsoft@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2006 - 15:03:04 ART

• Next message: kevin gannon: "Re: CCIE# 16320"
• Previous message: Joe Rinehart: "RE: CCIE# 16320"
• Maybe in reply to: James Simons: "multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Next in thread: darbyweaver@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Maybe reply: darbyweaver@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

AFAIR,

It is also possible to block incoming/outgoing multicast packets
using "ip multicast rate-limit" without specifying bitrate

HTH
Petr

• Next message: kevin gannon: "Re: CCIE# 16320"
• Previous message: Joe Rinehart: "RE: CCIE# 16320"
• Maybe in reply to: James Simons: "multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Next in thread: darbyweaver@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Maybe reply: darbyweaver@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: multicast boundry versus igmp access-group"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:31 ART