From: Venkataramanaiah.R (vramanaiah@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2006 - 16:01:13 ART
James, Good sense of humour, and i am also for what you are
suggesting, but i think you do not realize that at times due to
geographical limiations and to cut cost, people do opt for ring
topo... so i am looking for some real life experience or some pointers
to some real life case studies :-)
Thanks
-Venkat
On 6/1/06, James Ventre <messageboard@ventrefamily.com> wrote:
> Typically, The best practice is to do triangles. You do a triangle with
> Your Switch, STP Root and Secondary Root. Rings, Squares, Boxes,
> Octagons, etc. generally have higher convergence times when failures
> happen and can produce some suboptimal paths depending on how many nodes
> are involved.
>
> James
>
>
>
> Venkataramanaiah.R wrote:
> > Has anyone implemented such a topology... If so, whatz the max count
> > of switches you have
> > in the ring..?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:31 ART