From: Vincent Mashburn (vmashburn@fedex.com)
Date: Wed May 31 2006 - 10:19:49 ART
If you are utilizing frame-relay and nbar, you could do something like
the following:
Class-map no-fragment
Match not protocol rtp
Policy-map no-frag
Class no-fragment
Map-class test
Service-policy output no-frag
Fragment 60
Then, apply the map-class to your frame-relay traffic-shaped interface.
Also, note that you can do this without nbar, but you will have to use
an access-list to match on port numbers.
Hope this helps.
Vince Mashburn
Voice / Data Engineer
901-263-5072
CCVP, CCNP, CCDA,Network +
Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist
Cisco IP Telephony Operations Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Koen Zeilstra
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:19 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame-relay fragment & exclude voice pakkets from being
fragmented
Hi group,
Suppose I want to use frame-relay fragmentation and use fragments of 60.
However voice traffic should not be fragemented at all. How is this
achieved?
A service policy under a FR can select more options however
fragmentation
is not part of the policy-map options.
On DocCD I found frame-relay ip rtp priority. Hoever in my opionion this
is a queueing strategy and not excluding traffic from being fragemented.
thanks in advance for your answer,
Koen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:23 ART