From: Koen Zeilstra (koen@koenzeilstra.com)
Date: Wed May 31 2006 - 05:35:04 ART
So that's more an avoid scenario than a conditional fragmentation
scenario, I guess?
Conditional fragmentation is not possible?
-----------------------
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they
never have to stop and answer the phone.
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Petr Lapukhov wrote:
| Koen,
|
| You can try "frame-relay ip rtp header compression"
|
| That will shrink voice packets from average 60, to 20+, and
| will help them avoid fragmentation.
|
| HTH
| Petr
|
| 2006/5/31, Koen Zeilstra <koen@koenzeilstra.com>:
| >
| > Hi group,
| >
| > Suppose I want to use frame-relay fragmentation and use fragments of 60.
| > However voice traffic should not be fragemented at all. How is this
| > achieved?
| >
| > A service policy under a FR can select more options however fragmentation
| > is not part of the policy-map options.
| >
| > On DocCD I found frame-relay ip rtp priority. Hoever in my opionion this
| > is a queueing strategy and not excluding traffic from being fragemented.
| >
| > thanks in advance for your answer,
| >
| > Koen
| >
| > _______________________________________________________________________
| > Subscription information may be found at:
| > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
|
| _______________________________________________________________________
| Subscription information may be found at:
| http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART