From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Tue May 30 2006 - 23:42:19 ART
Kemal - I would like to see your configuration, can you please share. I
don't believe that this is possible without a mapping at the spokes.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Kemal YILDIRIM [mailto:kemalhy@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:58 PM
To: Schulz, Dave; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Frame - eigrp and split horizon
Hi Dave,
I have just tested the same scenerio and I have found no problem.
May be it is a typo but you maped HUS's IP adress to the same DLCI with
one
of spoke. You sould see frame mappings like below.
HUB:
Serial0/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status defined, active
Serial0/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.3 dlci 504(0x1F8,0x7C80), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status defined, active
Spoke 1:
Serial1/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.1 dlci 305(0x131,0x4C10), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Serial1/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.3 dlci 304(0x130,0x4C00), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Spoke 2:
Serial0/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.1 dlci 405(0x195,0x6450), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Serial0/0 (up): ip 192.168.1.2 dlci 403(0x193,0x6430), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Objects are what is unalterable and subsistent;
their configuration is what is changing and unstable.
So, you need PRACTICE, PRACTICE, AND MORE PRACTICE...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Schulz, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:13 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Frame - eigrp and split horizon
Question on split horizon....
I set up a hub router on a frame with the following configuration.....
interface Serial0/0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no ip split-horizon eigrp 100
frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.1 102
frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.2 102 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.3 103 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.1.0
no auto-summary
There are two remote sites, with the following configuration.....
interface Serial0/0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 203
no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 204
and......
interface Serial0
ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 302
no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 304
!
Both set up with eigrp 100. They both form the neighbor relationship
with the hub router. However, there is still not connectivity from
spoke to spoke (even though split horizon is disabled). I know that
everything works if I statically map everything, just trying to
understand a little further on the eigrp between multiple routers. I
was thinking that this may be a recursive issue, but I see that we have
the route recursing to the hub router, but not continuing from the hub
to the second spoke.....
R2#sh ip rou 192.168.1.3
Routing entry for 192.168.1.0/24
Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via Serial0/0
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
I may be missing something. Sorry for hitting on some of the more basic
things.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART