Re: ip redistribution vs ipv6 redistribution

From: Gianpietro Lavado (gianpietro1@gmail.com)
Date: Sun May 28 2006 - 18:47:10 ART


It is required in IPv6, but another alternative, which I always use, is
to use the keyword "include-connected" at the end of the redistribute
<protocol> command ... instead of using the "redistribute connected"
command.

Take a look at the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_refer
ence_chapter09186a00801d6617.html#wp2007021

Gianpietro

On 5/28/06, lim es <tiga72@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi group,
>
> when u do ipv6 redistribution between 2 igps, u always
> have to "redistribute connected?" on each of the ipg u
> are doing the redistribtion.
>
> In ip, this is not normally required.
>
> any ideas?
>
> TIA
>
> Lim
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART